This Is Big: Liquid Water 'Lake' Found On Mars

Advertisement


An Italian team of scientists says it has strong evidence of a subsurface lake of liquid water on Mars. It's a discovery that adds to the speculation that there could once have been life on Mars — and raises the possibility that it might be there still today, since liquid water is an essential ingredient for life.

The evidence comes from an instrument called MARSIS aboard the European Space Agency's Mars Express spacecraft in orbit around the Red Planet. MARSIS is a special kind of radar called ground-penetrating radar.

"Ground-penetrating radars use radio signals that are capable of penetrating into the ground and then get reflections from the material under the surface," says Roberto Orosei, principal investigator on MARSIS and a planetary scientist at the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics.

Such radars are useful when searching for liquid water, "because water is a very strong radar reflector," he says. From May 2012 through December 2015, the Mars Express radar mapped an area near the south pole of Mars. When Orosei and his colleagues analyzed the data, they saw what looked like a lake of water about 12 miles in diameter and a mile below a surface layer made up of water ice and dust.


There are hundreds of these subglacial lakes on Earth, mostly in Antarctica. But Orosei and his colleagues knew better than to run right out and announce to the world they'd found liquid water on Mars. Remarkable claims that seem too good to be true frequently are. Instead, they tried to come up with as many other explanations as possible for what they were seeing.

"After years, literally a couple of years of ... discussion, debate and let's say general head-scratching," Orosei says, "we really felt confident that any other explanation would fail." Or, he adds, paraphrasing Sherlock Holmes, "Once you exclude everything that is impossible, what remains necessarily has to be the truth."

report on the discovery of the underground lake appears in the journal Science. Other scientists are impressed.


"I think this is extremely strong evidence that there is liquid water beneath the poles in this south polar layered terrain on Mars, which is extremely exciting," says Ellen Stofan, the John and Adrienne Mars Director at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum. Before joining the museum, she was a member of the MARSIS science team.

Stofan says finding liquid water is something scientists are extremely interested in scientifically, "because life here on Earth evolved in liquid water. It stayed in the oceans for over a billion years. And so as we go outward from the Earth, looking for evidence of life beyond Earth, we're always looking for liquid water."

The water in the Martian underground lake is probably salty, otherwise it would freeze solid, even deep in the ground, Stofan says.



And the salts are mostly likely made up of something called perchlorates, "which are very toxic to life here on Earth. But on Mars, who knows?"

It's not clear where the water the Italian team found is coming from, and it's not certain there are any other underground lakes to be found. But you can bet the new results will encourage others to look.

Comments

  1. This is what is wrong in society today. Science comes from thoes with diplomas from a crakerjack box. Just review the article starting with the title.

    They found a liquid water 'lake' on Mars! Where is this liquid water? We are talking about water, H2o right? Because in the first sentence of the article they show how it is not found. They have strong evidence.

    They claim the image from the sensor used is appearing similar to that of a liquid or frozen liquid of some sort by one of the poles of Mars. No mention of other substances that would reflect a similar image to produce a false positive to the results.

    This is not a scientifically correct article or even correct in supporting the claim made in the title.

    Personally, I believe there is water on Mars and it is only a matter of time until it is located. But I also believe people are claiming to be scientist and are disregarding scientific process. No longer do people regard the process of preparing a hypothesis and submitting it to the rigors of the process to become a theory. No, we call anything a theory, from which flake a goldfish will eat first to what causes nano worm holes to form in the gaps between neutrons and protons in atoms allowing instantaneous communication between all atoms of the same type.

    Even things that can never ever possibly be proven can never be called a theory. Its people like neil tyson degrassi that mix things up and are more tv stars than scientist. Listen to his tapings on the big bang, listen to most of his work and dont be afraid to ask what is that unknown part you mention. What is this accepted speculative physics and how do we calculate that. How do we go into a black hole and come back?

    I have tried contacting many, none return my emails. They must fall into the internet's black hole lol.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment